- 1 Do Irish people support Celtic?
- 2 Who has the biggest fanbase Celtic or Rangers?
- 3 Do the Royals support Rangers?
- 4 Do the Irish like the royal family?
- 5 What country has the most Celtic people?
- 6 Why are Celtic fans called Tims?
- 7 Does Robert Downey Jr support Celtic?
- 8 Who do Celtic fans support in England?
- 9 Do Celtic have the best fans in the world?
- 10 Why is England not considered Celtic?
Why are Celtic fans against the monarchy?
Why do Celtic fans hate the Royal family? As football fans around the world united to mourn the death of Queen Elizabeth II, one club stood out. Tempers flared when Celtic F.C took to the field. The Celtic faithful displayed shocking banners in the stands in their Champions League game away to Shakhtar Donetsk and chanted demeaning songs aimed at the Royal Family.
What this illustrates is the bitter sectarianism still rife in Scottish culture, especially in Glasgow. It reveals the atrocities committed by the Crown towards Irishmen, with whom Celtic shares a historical bond. Most Scots are descendants of various ancient Celtic tribes. It’s especially prevalent in the Catholic-majority East End of Glasgow, the poorest suburb in the Scottish capital and home to Celtic Football Club.
Historically, Ireland caught itself trapped in the crossfire of the British Royal power struggle. On numerous occasions, Ireland was sanctioned for supporting the wrong monarch. The failure of the 1534 rebellion by the heir of the popular Fitzgerald, Earls of Kildare proved to be pivotal.
Anarchy spread across Ireland, with minorities having their rights snatched away. The harsh measures of King Henry VIII and his daughter, Queen Elizabeth I only made things worse. Naturally, the Crown put the blame squarely on the Catholics. Shifting the narrative allowed the monarch to vanquish Catholics into the social fringes.
It also allowed the Royals to promote Protestantism and dissolve the Catholic majority Church of Ireland and merge with the Church of England. Until the 20th century, systematic oppression of Irish Catholics continued. Although many people took a stand during this period, including the disastrous 1848 Young Ireland Rebellion, it only brought more tyranny.
‘The Penal Laws’, aimed at outlawing Catholicism and pan-Irish sentiments, weakened the socioeconomic position of Irish Catholics. The Potato Famine of 1879 proved disastrous. With no food, no work and no future in their homeland, thousands of poor Irish Catholics immigrated to the industrially robust Glasgow.
Against this cruel setting, Celtic Football Club was formed on the 6th of November in 1887 by Irish Marist Brother Walfrid. Its purpose was simple. To act as the voice for the Irish Catholics who suffered from the Crown’s barbarity. Over the years, their zealous hatred for the British Monarchy only grew as the Crown oppressed Ireland mercilessly.
During Irish Troubles between 1960 and 1998, British troops swooped down on Ireland. Celtic fans showed unconditional support for Irish Republicanism and the Irish Republican Army (IRA). Their fierce anti-monarchy stance shone through. Celtic’s resentment for the monarchs was turbocharged by the prevailing intolerance in Glasgow.
It runs so deep that there was a period when Rangers refrain from signing Catholic players. Celtic’s rivalry with the unionist, pro-Royal Rangers also fuels the fire among the club’s faithful to bring the British Royal Family to justice for the atrocities they committed against Catholics and the Irish.
The historical influence of Celtic in Scottish culture is undeniable, with Hibernian and Dundee United fans following Celtic in jeering the British Monarchy. Additionally, it portrays the bigger picture. The world is becoming increasingly aware of the misdeeds of the ancestors of the Royal Houses. References 1.
Unofficial Royalty.13 May 2011. The tangled history of Ireland and the British Crown. Inqiad is a long-suffering Man United fan and a self-proclaimed Targaryen. Contact him at : Why do Celtic fans hate the Royal family?
What did Celtic say about the Queen?
Celtic fans mock the Queen’s death with ‘F*** The Crown’ taunts Published: 08:39 BST, 15 September 2022 | Updated: 12:20 BST, 15 September 2022
- Celtic fans mocked ‘s death with a banner that read ‘F*** The Crown’ and chants of ‘if you hate the, clap your hands’ last night – while Rangers defied Uefa’s ban on British teams playing the national anthem.
- Scottish football is divided by sectarianism and many fans who follow Rangers identify themselves as Protestant and unionist, while many who support Celtic identify themselves as Catholic and Irish,
- Celtic fans unveiled the offensive banner just before their clash with Ukrainian side Shakhtar Donetsk last night, with BT Sport forced to apologise after honing in on it at the game played in Warsaw.
All UK teams playing home or away were allowed to hold a one-minute silence as a mark of respect for the Queen, who died last week. But following a pre-match meeting between Celtic, Shakhtar and Uefa, it was decided there would be no silence before kick-off.
Players from both teams did wear black armbands in Her Majesty’s memory. However, the sentiment clearly wasn’t shared by an element of the travelling Celtic support. Just before kick-off a banner was unveiled that read: ‘F*** The Crown.’ As the Champions League anthem was being played another banner was unfurled that also mocked the death of the Queen.
It read: ‘Sorry for your loss Michael Fagan.’ Fagan famously managed to scale the Buckingham Palace walls before creeping into Her Majesty’s bedroom while she slept in 1982. The then painter and decorator spent around 10 minutes talking to the monarch about his family.
The Queen thought Fagan was just a drunk member of staff, who was eventually tackled by a duty footman. Celtic fans mock the Queen’s death with a banner at their Champions League tie with Shakhtar Donetsk in Warsaw last night As the Champions League anthem was played, Celtic fans unfurled a banner saying ‘Sorry for your loss Michael Fagan’ Celtic fans mocked the Queen’s death with offensive banners at the Champions League tie in Warsaw yesterday evening Rangers defied a ban from Uefa as they blasted ‘God Save the King’ out of their speakers at Ibrox yesterday evening Fans of Rangers sing ‘God Save The King’ after a minute’s silence tribute to Queen Elizabeth II at Ibrox yesterday evening Rangers elected to ignore the ruling by Uefa on not playing the National Anthem – and played it regardless before the match The Celtic game took place in Warsaw due to the ongoing conflict in Ukraine at the hands of Russia.
Thousands of supporters had trekked to Poland in support of Celtic in their second Champions League match of the season. Meanwhile Rangers defied Uefa’s ban on British teams playing the national anthem before Champions League matches last night as the Scottish side played ‘God Save The King’ through speakers at Ibrox.
- Arsenal’s Europa League tie against PSV Eindhoven has been rescheduled for October 20 after the game – which was due to be played tonight – was postponed amid police resourcing issues related to the Queen’s death.
- There were concerns Arsenal may have had to forfeit the match if an alternative date could not be found, but the Premier League has agreed to postpone the Gunners’ match against Manchester City which had been scheduled for October 19.
The match will now kick off at 6pm on October 20, Uefa said in a statement. The Premier League said that a new date for the Arsenal v City match would be announced in due course. The league already faces a challenge to rearrange all of last weekend’s matches, which were postponed as a mark of respect to the Queen, plus three games due to be played this weekend – Brighton v Crystal Palace, Manchester United v Leeds and Chelsea v Liverpool.
- Finding available slots in the calendar for all these matches is especially challenging this season because of the staging of the World Cup in Qatar in November and December.
- Senior sources within the game have said that one option which may have to be looked at is to scrap FA Cup third and fourth-round replays for the third season in a row to free up two midweek slots in January and February to alleviate the congestion, but it is recognised that these matches can be of enormous financial and sporting benefit, particularly to lower-league clubs.
- The Premier League confirmed its plans to pay tribute to the Queen at this weekend’s matches which are still going ahead.
Fans will be asked to join a minute’s silence, which will be followed by the national anthem. Big screens and perimeter boards will pay tribute to the Queen and flags at stadia will fly at half-mast. Fans will also be invited to applaud at the 70-minute mark, in recognition of the Queen’s 70-year reign.
- The start of the new Barclays Women’s Super League season was called off last weekend after all English football fixtures were postponed as a mark of respect following the Queen’s death.
- Arsenal will now open the campaign at home to Brighton on Friday evening, having originally been set to be away at Manchester City for their first game.
The dates for all of the rescheduled fixtures is yet to be announced.
- Fans in the Broomloan Road stand also held up cards to create a vast mosaic of the queen’s profile on the background of the Union Flag above a banner reading ‘1926 Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II 2022’.
- A post on the Rangers official website said: ‘Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II was honoured at Ibrox this evening with a minute’s silence, a display created by the Union Bears, and a rendition of the national anthem.’
- There was a growing sense throughout the day that Rangers and Chelsea, who saw supporters encouraged by a fan group to ‘belt out’ the anthem before their match with Red Bull Salzburg, would both disregard the anthem ruling from UEFA.
- With no visiting Napoli fans in tow, due to policing shortages, the Rangers-only crowd first observed a minute’s silence impeccably before the national anthem was then played out over the PA system.
- Uefa said today that it is yet to decide whether to investigate Rangers’ decision to play the national anthem, saying that action will only be considered once it has received the necessary information from its match delegate.
- At Chelsea there were plenty of tributes to the Queen and there was an impromptu version of the British national anthem sung by supporters before kick-off, despite guidance not to do so.
- Sportsmail exclusively revealed earlier this week that Uefa turned down requests from British clubs to play the national anthem before European matches following the Queen’s death.
- Manchester City, Chelsea and Rangers all made pleas to be given licence to play God Save The King ahead of their home fixtures.
- Uefa refused ‘on the basis of maintaining a consistent pre-match ceremony with a subdued atmosphere and without any celebratory activities across all UK venues to show respect’.
- European football’s governing body elected not to play the Champions League anthem before kick-off and black armbands were worn by teams and staff where requested but the anthem was not permitted.
- But Rangers chose to completely disregard the Uefa ruling and the PA announcer confirmed before the silence that the British national anthem would follow.
- Manchester City made a plea to Uefa but, having been denied that right, they followed protocol and did not play the anthem out, as Rangers did.
- Chelsea did not play it through the stadium speakers but fans rallied for a rendition of the anthem prior to the silence.
- In Manchester, both City and opponents Borussia Dortmund did, however, observe a minute’s silence in memory of the Queen.
- Thousands of Rangers fans arrived armed with flags in tribute to the Queen, while Union Jack flags adorned the outskirts of the stadium ahead of Rangers’ Champions League homecoming.
- Chelsea fans produced their own banner tribute at their Shed End with a message reading: ‘RIP Your Majesty before committing to a version of the national anthem as players emerged from the tunnel.
Earlier this week a Chelsea fan group urged supporters to ‘belt out’ the anthem that evening in defiance to UEFA’s ban. An image to Twitter showed some supporters setting up at Stamford Bridge with Union flags ahead of the game. The picture showed one end of the ground decked out in Union flags, and in the accompanying post it encouraged fans coming to the game to do the same.
- It stated: ‘Setting up for tomorrow.
- Bring your Union Jack flags tomorrow if you have them.
- RIP Your Majesty’.
- Red Bull Salzburg’s fans paid their own tribute by walking to Stamford Bridge in silence.
- In a video shared from the Austrian club’s Twitter page, fans can be seen solemnly walking to the stadium in silence.
Chelsea did not play the national anthem through the stadium speakers but fans rallied for a rendition prior to the silence Chelsea fans hung a tribute banner to the Queen before singing the national anthem before their tie against Red Bull Salzburg A minute’s silence for the Queen prior to the Manchester City v Borussia Dortmund match in Manchester last night A flag is held during the minute’s silence for prior to the Manchester City and Borussia Dortmund match last night ‘Out of respect for the Queen, our fans walked in silence from Earl’s Court to the stadium,’ a tweet read.
- Uefa said no anthems were being played in order to maintain a ‘consistent pre-match ceremony with a subdued atmosphere and without any celebratory activities across all UK venues to show respect as we did last Thursday.’
- A minute’s silence was also observed before the matches at Chelsea’s Stamford Bridge and at the Etihad Stadium in Manchester, with banners honouring the late monarch also on display at those grounds.
- Britain is in the midst of a period of mourning for Elizabeth II, who reigned for seven decades until her death at Balmoral in Scotland last Thursday. Her state funeral will take place next Monday
- God Save The King was first sung before Saturday’s third test between England South Africa at the Oval and is set to used at Premier League games this weekend as part of the tributes being paid to the passing of The Queen.
Last Thursday, just hour after the Queen’s death was announced, there were similarly moving scenes at other matches. Thousands of West Ham fans broke into an emotional rendition of ‘God Save the Queen’. : Celtic fans mock the Queen’s death with ‘F*** The Crown’ taunts
Do Rangers fans like the Queen?
Rangers are well known for their respect for the monarchy. From the traditional Loving Cup ceremony to the picture of Her Majesty on the dressing room wall, nods to the royals are never far away at Ibrox. The club’s fans were widely praised for their tribute to the late Queen Elizabeth II following her death at Balmoral earlier this month.
And it seems the affection may not have been one-sided. The Queen was actually the owner of a Rangers picture at Buckingham Palace. The surprising find came about during a grilling of the Keeper of the Privy Purse 20 years ago. READ MORE: Queen Elizabeth II could be made a SAINT following her death as ‘two miracles’ claim made At the time, it was reported that MPs had expressed dismay at the £32 million backlog in palace finances.
But amid the usual left-wing moaning was the surprising Rangers find. Then Glasgow South West Labour MP Ian Davidson was questioning the Queen’s treasurer Sir Allan Reid about an inventory of the Queen’s treasures, which she owned on behalf of the nation. Former MP Ian Davidson (Image: SNS) “I was very surprised to find that on a wall in the palace but since that is my local team I can go home and tell my constituents that they are not forgotten in the palace.” Sir Allan responded: “The one may not be in the inventory.
Do Irish people support Celtic?
Irish republicanism – Celtic supporters have traditionally been associated with support for Irish republicanism, and the flying of Irish flags at matches is common. Some groups of Celtic supporters also sing or chant Irish folk and rebel songs, which express support for the Irish struggle for freedom.
- These songs are culturally emblematic to Irish society and the historic founding of the Irish Free State.
- In 2008 and 2010, there were protests by groups of fans over the team wearing the poppy symbol for Remembrance Day, as it is a divisive symbol in Ireland.
- Celtic have expressed disapproval of these protests, saying they are damaging to the image of the club and its fans, and that they will ban those involved.
In November 2011, Celtic were fined £12,700 by UEFA for pro-IRA chanting from some Celtic supporters. In response to this in their Europa League game against Udinese, Celtic fans were seen to have unveiled a banner reading “Fuck UEFA”. The club condemned the act, banning for life the supporter responsible for the display, whilst UEFA fined Celtic €25,000 in relation to the incident and related events during the match.
In December 2013, the club were fined £42,000 by UEFA for an “incident of a non-sporting nature” in relation to a display shown by a section of the Celtic support before their Champions League group stage tie against Italian side AC Milan, The banners displayed by the Green Brigade ultras group showed portraits of Scottish hero William Wallace and Irish hunger striker Bobby Sands side by side along with the text: “The terrorist or the dreamer? The savage or the brave? Depends on whose vote you’re trying to catch or whose face you’re trying to save”.
After the disciplinary hearing, the club issued a statement in which they condemned the banners and stated that the actions of a “small minority must stop”. After the incident, Celtic relocated 250 supporters from section 111 and issued temporary bans to over 100 more.
Who has the biggest fanbase Celtic or Rangers?
CELTIC may have won the league but Rangers are still the world’s “favourite Scottish football club” – and even have a fan in the Vatican – according to a study. Researchers analysed Google search trends for all 42 of Scotland’s senior football clubs to discover which ones attracted the most interest worldwide last year. 2 Todd Cantwell scored as Rangers beat Celtic at the weekend Credit: Getty 2 Celtic and Postecoglou have secured the league title once again this season Credit: Kenny Ramsay Data provider Semrush looked at searches in 225 different places around the world. The Glasgow giants both claim a global fanbase and were predictably out in front with more than a million searches each per month. Celtic were firm favourites in boss Ange Postecoglu ‘s Australia and in Japan, where five of their stars including World Cup star Daizen Maeda call home as well as in Ireland, where the club has historic links. But the findings also reveal support for other Scottish clubs and bragging rights in some unexpected locations.
Hearts got the most clicks in Lavia, for example, possibly due to their clashes with champions RFS in the Europa Conference League, while Kilmarnock had most fans in Malta. Hibs attracted the most attention in the British Virgin Islands, while Aberdeen appear to have the most fans in the Caribbean island of Montserrat.
In an amusing twist, the research shows an average of just one single Google search per month in the Vatican City for any Scottish football team – and it is for Rangers. Rangers’ global success in 2022 was boosted significantly by their run to the Europa League Final in May.
Do Celtic fans support Scotland or Ireland?
The Glasgow club have a rich history that has a distinct Irish flavour to it – GOAL takes a look at the connection Celtic hold the distinction of being the first British club to win the European Cup and they are among Britain’s best supported teams. However, while they are undoubtedly Scottish and British, the Glasgow outfit have a strong connection to Ireland and a unique affinity with Irish supporters.
How do Scots feel about the Queen?
Scottish crowds turn out for the Queen but support for the monarchy less clear It has become Scotland’s largest public event of modern times; hundreds of thousands of people gathered on roadsides, in farm fields and on bridges as the Queen’s funeral cortege drove 170 miles from Balmoral to Edinburgh.
- The crowd in Edinburgh’s Old Town as her hearse passed along the Royal Mile on Sunday was the densest the city has seen.
- That display of compassion, curiosity and, for some, fealty could suggest the support for monarchism in Scotland is deeper than many suspected.
- The observance was understated, restrained.
There were very few union flags or saltires on display; only a handful of flowers were thrown under the hearse’s wheels. Applause could be heard occasionally but chiefly the crowds were silent. Unionists among the 1.4 million Scots who vote for anti-independence parties are likely to draw strength from that.
I think this will establish how strong the feeling is for being part of the UK. That’s part of the reason I’m here,” said Elizabeth Alexander, watching the cortege pass with her grandchildren in Ballater, Aberdeenshire, on Sunday. That may be misplaced. The question facing unionists and the new monarch,, is whether the deep affection for his mother translates into support for him and for the institution.
Recent polling suggests it may not. In May this year, the thinktank British Futures found that only 45% of Scottish voters wanted to keep the monarch, versus 60% at UK level, while 36% of Scots said the end of the Queen’s reign would be the right moment to establish a republic – a figure nearly replicated by a Panelbase poll the previous year.
- That presents Charles and his son Prince William, now heir apparent, with a challenge: how to convert that outpouring on the Queen’s death into enduring support for the institution, and for the King personally.
- Charles, despite his popularity at the Braemar Highland Games this month, and his own deep affection for Balmoral – exemplified by his children’s book based there, The Old Man of Lochnagar – has failed to insert himself into Scotland’s psyche in the way his mother did.
There is a second question: does support for the monarchy translate necessarily into support for Scotland remaining in the union? Before the 2014 independence referendum, Alex Salmond, then first minister, stressed that the Queen would remain head of state if Scotland voted yes.
There were about the prospects of a yes vote. Four days before referendum day, she told an onlooker outside Crathie kirk, close to Balmoral: “I hope people will think very carefully about the future.” That day, the Sunday Times published a poll wrongly predicting 51% of Scots would vote yes. Now, however, support for independence hovers close to that point.
Salmond, who relished his weekend stays at Balmoral with his wife, Moira, during the Queen’s summer residencies there, was desperate to demonstrate continuity. That was in part to avoid unnecessarily alienating the majority of Scots who do not think a republic should be established, at a delicate time.
- Nicola Sturgeon, his successor as Scottish National party leader and first minister, appears much less of a monarchist, but has shored up that position.
- Sturgeon, who appeared genuinely delighted to meet the Queen earlier this year, told MSPs in June, when Holyrood marked the platinum jubilee, that she believed the Queen to be “an extraordinary woman” who deserved “deep gratitude and respect” for her dedication.
But there is a deep undercurrent of republicanism within Scottish nationalism and the wider yes movement. Research published in 2012 by Prof James Mitchell, Lynn Bennie and Rob Johns, for Oxford University Press, showed 57% of SNP members believed strongly or very strongly that the monarchy had no place in a modern society.
That republicanism is deprioritised by the SNP for pragmatic and electoral reasons. SNP politicians rarely even hint that they disapprove of the monarchy. Republicanism is present in today’s Scottish government: two pro-independence Scottish Green party junior ministers, Patrick Harvie and Lorna Slater, who are also the party’s co-leaders, boycotted Holyrood’s debate to commemorate the Queen’s platinum jubilee in June.
Slater contrived to be away from Edinburgh on government business; Harvey and two other Green MSPs walked out of the chamber before the debate began. They were also absent on Sunday when Sturgeon and other party leaders gathered in the parliament for the proclamation of the new king, avoiding giving the royal oath.
- And on Sunday there was a by the Radical Independence Campaign on the Royal Mile, with one arrest.
- The SNP leadership and the crown have danced around each other, each hoping the other will not prove a problem,” Mitchell, from the University of Edinburgh, wrote for Holyrood magazine on Sunday.
- Nicola Sturgeon will not want to pick a fight, indeed keen to show her loyalty to the crown.
Much will depend on what comes next. Charles has inherited the crown but not the public affection felt for his mother nor her political sensibility.” Prof Tom Devine, regarded as Scotland’s foremost historian, agrees with Mitchell. “My speculation would be that there will be two phases to the UK’s response to the death of the Queen,” he said.
For a period of time there will be tremendous good wishes and also sympathy for the royal family in general and Charles in particular, having lost his mother, because of the affection the British people had for her. After that, I think there will be little chance of him attracting that same level of affection.” This article was amended on 13 September 2022.
The British Futures poll was in May this year, not in 2021. And a reference in an earlier version to “the majority of Scots who support the monarchy” should have referred instead to a majority of Scots not thinking a republic should be established; this figure includes poll respondents who did not have a view, or who rejected the available options.
Did the Queen have any Scottish blood?
Her Majesty the Queen was bound to Scotland by ties of ancestry, affection and duty. She was descended from the Royal House of Stewart on both sides of her family. Her relationship with Scotland and the Scots began in childhood, and deepened during her many private as well as official visits throughout the seven decades of her reign. Detail from ‘An Historical and Genealogical Tree of the Royal Family of Scotland’ by John Brown, 1792 Crown copyright, National Records of Scotland, RH16/135 Royal Arms of Queen Elizabeth, Consort of King George VI, 1937 Court of the Lord Lyon Royal Coat of Arms of the United Kingdom for use in Scotland, drawn by AGL Samson, Lyon Court Court of the Lord Lyon
How did the Irish react to the Queen dying?
The death of Queen Elizabeth II has drawn condolences from across the globe. Among those who paid tribute were Irish politicians, who praised the queen’s efforts to repair strained ties between Ireland and Britain. But for many Irish, the occasion of the queen’s death — and her legacy — surfaced emotions that were much more mixed.
- Some of the reactions — including a group of soccer fans singing “Lizzy’s in a box!” in Dublin on Friday — were denounced as callous.
- But others have spoken to a long, painful history of violent conflict and colonial rule.
- Ireland gained its independence from Britain in 1922, ending eight centuries of English political and military intervention for most of the island.
Northern Ireland, though, remained part of the United Kingdom — and unresolved tensions between nationalists who wanted to be part of the republic and unionists loyal to the Crown led to decades of violence known as the Troubles between the late 1960s and late 1990s.
Anne Marie Quilligan, a social care worker from Ireland’s Limerick region, said on Thursday that the mixed reactions from Irish and other people whose nations suffered under the British Empire were “collective trauma.” “Unresolved trauma can become generational,” she wrote on Twitter. “Colonisation is a trauma.” Hannah Wanebo, an Irish American lawyer based in Dallas, wrote on Twitter that her Irish grandmother hated England so much that she would only travel home on flights that did not touch down on English soil.
“I’m shocked by how many people think the Potato Famine was due to crop failure and don’t know the English EXPORTED food from Ireland to England during that time — enough food to feed all the Irish who died,” Wanebo wrote, referring to the 19th-century famine in Ireland that resulted in the deaths of as many as a million Irish people and the emigration of another 2 million to 3 million escaping starvation.
- Elizabeth wasn’t queen during the Irish famine.
- But she reigned during the Troubles in Northern Ireland — and when the two sides made peace with the Good Friday Agreement in 1998.
- In 2011, she made history as the first monarch to travel to Ireland since its independence.
- Elizabeth traveled the country and addressed the two nations’ difficult, shared past head-on.
“To all those who have suffered as a consequence of our troubled past, I extend my sincere thoughts and deep sympathy,” she said in a speech at Dublin Castle. “With the benefit of historical hindsight, we can all see things which we would wish had been done differently or not at all.” In 2012, the queen shook hands with Martin McGuinness, a former commander of the Irish Republican Army who had become deputy First Minister of Northern Ireland.
The IRA, a paramilitary group that used violent tactics in its pursuit of Irish reunification, had killed the queen’s cousin in 1979. Michelle O’Neill, head of the nationalist Sinn Fein party that was previously associated with the IRA, shared her sympathies with the royal family Thursday. “Throughout the peace process she led by example in building relationships with those of us who are Irish, and who share a different political allegiance and aspirations to herself and her Government,” O’Neill said in a statement.
In a statement after her death, Taoiseach Micheál Martin, head of the Republic of Ireland’s government, said that state visit “marked a crucial step in the normalisation of relations with our nearest neighbour.” Mary Lou McDonald, president of Sinn Fein, called the queen “a powerful advocate and ally of those who believe in peace and reconciliation.” Others shared excerpts of a column last year by Patrick Freyne in the Irish Times, on the struggle between Prince Harry and Meghan, the Duchess of Sussex, and the rest of the royal family.
Freyne argued that the monarchy was an archaic institution with no future. “Having a monarchy next door is a little like having a neighbour who’s really into clowns and has daubed their house with clown murals, displays clown dolls in each window and has an insatiable desire to hear about and discuss clown-related news stories,” Freyne wrote in March 2021.
“More specifically, for the Irish, it’s like having a neighbour who’s really into clowns and, also, your grandfather was murdered by a clown.” Irish Times correspondent Naomi O’Leary pointed out that some videos and claims circulating on social media following the queen’s death were misinformation.
- The Associated Press debunked one claim that a video showing an Irish dance group performing a routine to the Queen song “Another One Bites the Dust” outside Buckingham Palace occurred on Thursday after the queen’s death.
- In fact, the group posted the video on social media months before, in January.
- With some exceptions, O’Leary said, the Irish public largely sympathizes with the British people over the loss of their queen.
“The actual response in Ireland is yes, some indifference because it’s not important to everybody,” she tweeted of the queen’s death, “But public expressions are overwhelmingly empathetic to our neighbours, friends and in many cases family members.” Karla Adam in London contributed to this report.
How do the Rangers pay respect to the Queen?
Rangers fans pay tribute to The Queen by singing national anthem before Champions League match against Napoli | Football News UEFA had rejected requests from Chelsea, Manchester City and Rangers to play the national anthem before Wednesday’s Champions League matches, but fans of the Scottish club pay tribute to The Queen before home tie against Napoli Thursday 15 September 2022 18:51, UK Image: Rangers and Napoli observed a minute’s silence at Ibrox
- Rangers fans have paid tribute to The Queen by singing the national anthem before the Napoli match, despite UEFA rejecting a request by the Scottish club.
- UEFA had rejected requests from Chelsea, Manchester City and Rangers to play the national anthem before Wednesday’s Champions League matches.
- But home fans sang the anthem before their Group A tie against Napoli at Ibrox.
- However, on Thursday, it was confirmed that Rangers will face no disciplinary action over the singing of ‘God Save The King’.
- “This incident is not the subject of any UEFA disciplinary proceedings,” a spokesperson said.
- The three British clubs were understood to have made requests to play ‘God Save the King’ following a period of silence in memory of Queen Elizabeth II.
Image: Rangers fans pay tribute to The Queen ahead of Napoli match
- UEFA, who had already decided against playing its Champions League anthem, had told Sky Sports News: “There will be no anthems played – this also includes the UEFA Champions League anthem – on the basis of maintaining a consistent pre-match ceremony with a subdued atmosphere and without any celebratory activities across all UK venues to show respect as we did last Thursday.”
- Only Rangers supporters were in attendance for their match against Napoli which was moved from Tuesday to Wednesday due to policing resources, with no away fans being permitted at the match in Naples too for sporting integrity.
Image: Rangers hosted Napoli in Group A of the Champions League
- UEFA has allowed a period of silence to be observed and black armbands to be worn at all matches featuring teams from the UK, but Rangers had indicated earlier on their official Twitter account they would go ahead with a “rendition of the national anthem.”
- Around 50,000 fans were invited to sing the national anthem after the minute’s silence and there was also union flag display in the Broomloan Road stand along with a banner which read ‘1926 Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth 2022’.
Do the Royals support Rangers?
Queen Elizabeth II – 5 of 5
Shaun Botterill/Getty Images Her first football match was as one of 100,000 supporters that packed Wembley Stadium for the 1953 FA Cup Final between Blackpool and Bolton Wanderers, The Tangerines won the final 4-3 thanks to a stoppage time winner from English Striker Bill Perry as a Hat-Trick by teammate Stan Mortensen was not enough to fight off the Trotters. The history of her affair with the beautiful game has many teams fighting to claim her support. Three London based clubs fight over her royal majesty while a Scottish giant also counts her as a powerful fan. League One side Millwall FC claims that she regularly attends matches at the clubs London stadium where she mingles anonymously with the local riff-raff without making her presence officially known. Another side claiming her support is West Ham United, A Daily Mirror article seems to believe that it is a staff member that supports Millwall FC, while the Queen actually supports their rival Hammers. However, it appears that the Queen, like her grandson Harry, is primarily a self-professed Arsenal fan, and is believed to have an eye for the Gunners Captain Cesc Fabregas, Last but not least it is believed that her Majesty also is or was a supporter of Glasgow Rangers, With 53 Scottish League Titles, they are footballing royalty all to their own as they have won their league more times than any other team has won their respected league in history. She is also famous for her comments on the beautiful game. In November of 2006 she made this comment to Premier League Chairman David Richards, “Football’s a difficult business and aren’t they prima donnas. But it’s a wonderful game.” Without a doubt, the Royal family certainly gets around in the world of Football.
Why do Rangers love the monarchy?
Long to reign over us? Rangers and the monarchy – The celebrations to mark the Queen’s Diamond Jubilee allowed many Rangers fans to revel in the overt display of British and monarchical symbolism, such as one would normally only see at Ibrox. Murdo Fraser, the Scottish Conservative MSP and Rangers fan, remarked on Twitter that his local supermarket was reminiscent of the Copland Road on match day.
The Jubilee celebrations, however, did not go uncontested. Republicans, socialists and some Scottish nationalists made clear their opposition to the monarchy as an institution and/or the sense of British identity the celebrations evoked. There would have been Rangers fans in these ranks too. The celebrations exacerbated constitutional anxieties and led to renewed discussion on the vexed issue of British identity.
This is undoubtedly healthy and necessary, particularly for supporters of the union, and it indicates a willingness to grapple with tough issues. Some of the problems facing the unionist political project are to be found in microcosm among the Rangers support but there seems to be less evidence of a desire to find contemporary justifications for traditional beliefs.
- Many fans will take comfort in old certainties and recent predicaments will encourage retrenchment and the comforting embrace of the familiar.
- For others, the dominant culture has become stifling, a caricature of its former self that does a disservice to the diversity of Rangers fans.
- Support for the monarchy has traditionally been considered one of the defining characteristics of the Rangers support.
It overlaps and reinforces other aspects such as unionism, Britishness and Protestantism. Evidence of royal sentiment is easy to find on the Copland Road or Edmiston Drive when Rangers are playing at home. The Queen’s image has been superimposed on flags and there is usually a photo-shopped picture of her in a Rangers top on sale adjacent to the subway entrance.
Home games are often marked by the singing of God Save the Queen but this isn’t normally taken up with any gusto. Furthermore, fans who have taken the tour of Ibrox will be familiar with the portrait of the Queen that hangs in the dressing room. In short, there is evidence enough to give credence to the popular perception that monarchism is still an important part of what it means to be a Rangers supporter.
Ronnie Esplin’s book Down the Copland Road is an important source for investigating the political sympathies of Rangers supporters in general and the monarchy in particular. As might be expected there was evidence of clear monarchist tendencies. An illustrative example might be the fan quoted as saying, ‘I’m one hundred percent behind the monarchy.
I think it’s an important part of being British and I consider myself British.’ But another fan said, ‘The monarchy is not something I think about too much to be honest. I’m not one of these God Save the Queen people, no way.I mean, how can they kid on they represent me, the working man in Scotland?’ This testimony serves to complicate commonly held notions and should lead to a wider process of critical evaluation focused on some the political and constitutional associations that are taken for granted when it comes to supporting Rangers.
What emerges from Down the Copland Road is a picture of a support with conflicting political allegiances and different attitudes to a number of important constitutional issues. It serves to undermine the stereotype of the average Ranger fan as a Tory voter and even a unionist in much the same way that it undermines uncomplicated ideas of monarchist sentiment.
- It is only correct to acknowledge that there was a certain historical affinity between working-class Protestants in the west of Scotland and the Conservative Party and that this can be explained, to a certain extent, by religious and cultural factors.
- But it is important to remember that the Conservatives drew support from a range of groups and across classes in Scotland until the 1980s.
Perhaps the most that can be said is that the affinity may have lasted longer for Rangers fans and west of Scotland working-class Protestants but, even at its height, there would have been a large number of Rangers fans who voted Labour. This is unsurprising in light of the limited evidence we have about the socio-economic profile of the support through to the 1970s which suggests the core of was drawn from skilled manual workers associated with heavy industries such as shipbuilding.
- Mark Dingwall has, in the past, suggested that the political affinities of most Rangers fans could probably be labelled ‘right-wing Labour’.
- As has been noted already, Esplin’s book poses a challenge to simplistic but popularly held notions of what it means to be a Rangers fan.
- The diversity of opinion is perhaps best captured by the fan who confesses to being both a member of the Orange Order and former SNP candidate in the council elections.
Indeed there are a number of fans who are open about their desire for an independent Scotland and Esplin cites survey evidence from 1990 which found 14% of Rangers fans who took part were SNP supporters as opposed to only 4% of Celtic fans. Given the political advance of the SNP since the book was published in 2000, it would be surprising if more Rangers fans were not voting ‘Alex Salmond for First Minister’.
It should be a source of concern that Esplin was moved to conclude, ‘notions of left-wing, anti-Royal and/or pro-independence Rangers fans is fine in theory but discussion would still be best kept away from Ibrox.fans with less conventional “Rangers style” political views, do well to keep silent.’ How many Rangers fans have stop attending games at Ibrox for reasons entirely unconnected to football? This speaks of a monolithic culture that is exclusionary and restricts what it means to be a Rangers fan, one that is not conducive to debate and dissent.
It risks creating a hierarchy of fans with only those who fully subscribe to certain political, religious and cultural associations being ‘true Rangers fans’. There is no such thing. Arguably, some prominent fans and figures associated with the club have contributed to this stereotyping by projecting their own sympathies onto the club and its history.
Some will no doubt argue that it is wrong to start questioning what are seen as the foundations of the fan culture surrounding Rangers. But this has only encouraged stereotyping and left the club and fans vulnerable to changes in wider society. The starting point for any discussion on the future direction of our culture should be a nod to the past and then an acknowledgement that supporting Rangers means supporting the eleven players in blue on the pitch at Ibrox.
This is the default setting, the fall-back position, the common bond. Everything else is-or at least should be-up for debate.
Is Snoop Dogg a Celtic fan?
CELEBRITY Celtic fan Snoop Dogg showed his true colours after his Glasgow gig on Thursday night. The 50-year-old music legend donned the latest Hoops jersey as he partied after performing at the OVO Hydro, 4 The rapper soon changed from his Paisley pattern top to another Scottish design. Credit: Getty 4 He pulled on his favourite jersey to pose with his pole-dancing stage act Credit: Instagram.com/kheannawalker Earlier he had the whole crowd bouncing with his back catalogue of hits but his choice of post-show clothing might split the city! He wore a Paisley-patterned tunic on stage before switching it up for a football top after the gig where he was supported on-stage by Nas and D12. But it’s his green and white attire after the show that has caught the imagination of Hoops fans, who count him among the club’s best-known fans. The rap mega-star’s latest jersey is not the first in his collection either – he was spotted as far back as 2005 wearing the club’s colours after a gift from DJ Big Al.
- Since then he has frequently kept up with the team’s progress – and kit.
- The Hoops-daft singer’s love affair with the club even extended to a motivational message to Ange Postecoglou’s troops a year ago.
- Snoop Dogg hailed his “boys” and warned the team “don’t let me down” after they chased the league title.
He promised to party with the players after they secured the title but it was last night he finally let his braided hair down in the city and donned the club top. Celtic even invited him after last season’s league win and eager fans are now keen to see the rap veteran at Parkhead for tomorrow’s match with Hibs. 4 Dancer Kheanna Walker partied with the rapper 4 Fans are loving the Hoops on the music mega-star Credit: Instagram.com/kheannawalker “Ye gaun tae the Celtic V Hibs game on Saturday Snoop ?” asked one fan. Another echoed: “Coming to the Celtic game on Saturday?” “Celtic game Saturday?” said another. The Gangsta’s Paradise star made the half-time draw on his 2017 drop-in. Keep up to date with ALL the latest news and transfers at the Scottish Sun football page
Do the Irish like the royal family?
‘Genuine interest’ – Tom Felle is the head of journalism and communication at the University of Galway. While he told The Journal that there’s a proportion of Irish people for whom the royals are simply celebrities, he added: “There’s a genuine interest and fascination in the royal family and in all things royal in Ireland and there has been pretty much for all time.
Go back 120 years to queen Victoria and at that time we were part of the United Kingdom,” said Felle. “She was welcomed here in Dublin with a kind of ticker tape parade, so it’s not unusual that that continues.” Felle notes that the “royals are celebrities” and adds that if you “understand them in that sort of culture” then the fascination with them is “perfectly understandable”.
“We’re all social animals, we all spend our time consumed by various media, and the royals have tapped into that,” said Felle. They’ve been part of the saturation coverage in magazines and news media for a long time. “Part of this is psychology and para-social behaviour, where people really do get emotionally invested in the lives of celebrities.
“That’s explained by the anatomy of virtually everyone online, we look for escapism and to live vicariously through other people. It’s why people are interested in sport or why we like to know all about celebrities. “The soap opera way they live their lives has always been part of the interest and the fascination with their family and that’s not changed, if anything it’s become even more intense in recent years.” But while many are fascinated with Harry and Meghan, and with Diana before them, Felle notes that the fascination with Charles isn’t quite so strong.
“This is not necessarily scientific,” said Felle, “but I had a quick look on Google Trends. “Harry and Meghan beat William by a distance, and while we can’t judge whether that’s positive or negative sentiment, the interest in terms of Google searches in Ireland is very much for Harry and Meghan.
William comes next, but a long way down from that is Charles. “So the Coronation is just another one of these events in the soap opera life of the royal family and people are interested in it generally, but I think there’s a great degree of difference in the interest between Charles and Harry and Meghan.” When asked if this lack of interest in Charles could be damaging for the future of the monarchy, Felle said that while there are fewer and fewer monarchies globally, the “British monarchy is probably the strongest of them all”.
However, he said that the “Commonwealth was held together by the Queen, and now that she’s gone, you’re certainly going to see the end of that empire, slowly but surely, one by one”. “During the last years of Elizabeth’s reign, we saw some pretty disastrous visits by the Royals, particularly to Jamaica in recent years,” notes Felle.
It’s been reported in the UK this week that Jamaica could hold a referendum on becoming a republic as early as next year. “Jamaica is looking to write a new constitution which will sever ties with the monarch as our head of state,” Jamaica’s minister for legal and constitutional affairs Marlene Malahoo Forte told Sky News.
“Time to say goodbye,” she added. Speaking to The Journal, Felle said: “So I think it’s inevitable that the Commonwealth will probably shrink under Charles’ reign. “Whether or not it leads to the immediate demise of the monarchy, I don’t see that. “I think English people are very attached to the royal family, they believe that it’s part of their culture, their traditions.”
What country has the most Celtic people?
Celts Around the World — Celtic Link
Introduction Emigration from the Celtic nations has been a feature for at least the last five hundred years.Driven by necessity (unemployment and even famine at home), or by economic opportunity abroad (in the mining industry, for example) the Celts moved overseas to start new lives in enormous numbers.
There are likely more than 120 million people of Celtic descent in North and South America, Australasia, Africa and Europe. The largest single group is from Ireland, followed by Scotland, Wales and Cornwall. The biggest single destination for migrating Celts, and hence the home of the majority of those with Celtic ancestry today, was the United States.
- Celtic culture remains vibrant in these diaspora countries, from the gigantic St Patrick’s Day parades in New York and Boston to festivals of Celtic music in Canada, the US and Australia.
- From the hundreds of Highland Games festivals and even the Welsh Eisteddfods in the remote Argentine province of Patagonia, people strive to keep their Celtic heritage alive and pass it on to the next generations.
Here we will document and celebrate the Celts around the world, highlighting the organisations and events keeping the flame of the ‘old countries’ burning brightly in their new homes. : Celts Around the World — Celtic Link
Who is richer Celtic or Rangers?
Despite their annual revenue falling by 17 per cent to £83.4million, the Scottish champions reached the top 70 of the annual rankings of the richest football teams. Rivals Rangers found a place in the top 120, according to the Daily Record, with their annual revenue of £53.2million, an increase from £32.6million.
What percentage of Scotland support Celtic?
Data shows how Celtic and Rangers fans dominate Scottish football If you’re going to a game, you’re probably going to see either or, That’s not bias towards the two most decorated clubs in Scotland, it’s just a fact. A study from the CIES Football Observatory has revealed that contribute more fans to total league attendances than any other club in world football. The next highest total in world football was Hadjuk Split, who could account for 33.9% of match-going fans in Croatia. Rangers weren’t far behind, either. Their contribution of 27.4% was the eighth highest in the entire world. Celtic’s average attendance of 49,697 places them 16th in the world, while are 18th for pulling in 49,054 fans on average when in the top flight. : Data shows how Celtic and Rangers fans dominate Scottish football
Are all Celtic fans Catholic?
Football – An Irish tricolour flag visibly held by Celtic fans (left) and the Union Jack and St George’s flag visible in the Rangers fans section (right) Sectarianism in Glasgow is particularly visible in the rivalry between the supporters of Glasgow’s two main football clubs, Celtic and Rangers, together known as the Old Firm,
- One study showed that 74% of Celtic supporters identify themselves as Catholic, whereas only 10% identify as Protestant; for Rangers fans, the figures are 2% and 65%, respectively.
- At Rangers’ Ibrox Stadium, the Union Flag and Ulster banner are often displayed, whilst at Celtic Park, the Irish tricolour is often displayed.
During the late 19th century, many immigrants came to Glasgow from Ireland, of whom around 75% were Catholic and around 25% Protestant. The foundation of Celtic, a club with a distinct Irish Catholic identity, was crucial in the subsequent adoption by Rangers of a Protestant, Unionist identity.
From around the 1920s onwards Rangers had an unofficial policy of not signing Catholic players or employing Catholics in other roles. Particularly from the 1970s, Rangers came under increasing social and media pressure to change their stance, despite several of the club’s directors continuing to deny its existence.
In 1989, Rangers signed Mo Johnston, their first major openly Roman Catholic signing whose transfer drew widespread attention not only due to his religion but as a former Celtic player, who had tentatively agreed to rejoin them before Rangers offered better financial terms and outbid their rivals.
Johnston was the highest-profile Catholic to sign for the club since the World War I era, although several players of the faith featured prior to that point. Since Johnston’s signing, an influx of overseas footballers has contributed to Catholic players becoming commonplace at Rangers. In 1999 Lorenzo Amoruso became the first Catholic captain of the club.
One Rangers spokesman used the term “90-minute bigot” to explain part of the problem of religious bigotry among supporters and suggested this bigotry should be dealt with first. While the majority of Celtic fans are Catholic, some of the key figures in the club’s history ( Jock Stein, Kenny Dalglish, and Danny McGrain amongst others) have come from a Protestant background.
- In recent times, both Old Firm teams have taken measures to combat sectarianism.
- Working alongside the Scottish Parliament, church groups, pressure groups such as Nil by Mouth, schools and community organisations, the Old Firm have endeavoured to clamp down on sectarian songs, inflammatory flag-waving, and troublesome supporters, using increased levels of policing and surveillance.
Both Celtic and Rangers have launched campaigns to stamp out sectarian violence and songs. Celtic’s Bhoys Against Bigotry, Rangers’ Follow With Pride (previously called Pride Over Prejudice ) and the cross-club Sense Over Sectarianism campaigns have attempted to reduce the connection between the Old Firm and sectarianism.
In August 2003, Rangers launched its ‘Pride Over Prejudice’ campaign to promote social inclusion, which has urged fans to wear only traditional Rangers colours and avoid offensive songs, banners and salutes. This involved publishing the ‘Blue Guide’, known as the “Wee Blue Book”, which contained a list of acceptable songs and was issued to 50,000 supporters in August 2007.
Research, however, suggests that football is unlikely to be the main source of sectarianism in Glasgow. An audit from the Crown Office in 2006 of religiously aggravated crimes in Scotland between January 2004 and June 2005, found that 33% of these were related to football.
- Given that 57% of religiously aggravated crimes in Scotland happened in Glasgow, at the very most approximately half of religiously aggravated crimes in Glasgow could have been football related in this period.
- In 2011, Celtic staff and fans, including then-manager Neil Lennon, were sent suspected explosive devices and bullets.
Subsequently, Dr John Kelly of University of Edinburgh suggested that “Recent events have buried the myth that anti-Irish Catholic bigotry no longer exists.”
Is Rory McIlroy a Celtic fan?
Rory McIlroy – Aberdeen – There seems to be a Fergie link to last year’s Augusta runner-up when it comes to football. McIlroy is believed to be a big Manchester United fan, but when quizzed on Twitter about his allegiance in Scotland he suggested Aberdeen – ex-team of Old Trafford legend Sir Alex Ferguson – were the team for him. Think he’ll pitch up in Pittodrie for the third-place run-in?
Why are Celtic fans called Tims?
What are the other nicknames of Celtic? – Celtic are not only known as The Bhoys. They also have nicknames such as Celts, Tims and Hoops, Celts and Tims generally refer to both the team and the supporters. Celts has a similarity to the club name Celtic, whereas the origin of Tims is thought to come from a Catholic gang from the early 1900s, which had the word ‘Tim’ in their name.
Does Robert Downey Jr support Celtic?
Robert Downey Jr is also an alleged Celtic fan.
Do Celtic fans like the Pope?
Details – The Pope has never been to Celtic Park. That’s a shame although unsurprising too. However the club has been very cooperative with Catholic practises, and in the past there have been large scale Catholic services held at the ground catering for the faithful.
- The Pope is a central figure in the world and with the Catholic historical roots of the club then he is unsurprisingly a much respected figure amongst most of the more pious section of the support.
- In the early years of the club when the influence and involvement of members of the church was substantial, after winning our first trophy a telegram was sent to the Vatican to inform the Holy Father of this success by a group from his flock.
Not known if there was any response, likely too busy to reply. As a measure of the club’s historical links to the Catholic church, in the 1950’s, the then manager was Jimmy McGrory who was a devout Catholic took up an invitation to play Lazio in 1950 in a match to mark their anniversary.
One benefit of this would be the ability to visit the Vatican and see the Holy Father the Pope himself in a mass service. Back in those days this was unprecedented for a group of working class folk to get such an opportunity so easily, and the honour was gratefully received. Celtic coach Jimmy Hogan, was a strongly practicing Roman Catholic told the Scottish Catholic Observer newspaper: “We were a matter of only a few yards from the Pope.
When the Celtic team was announced, he looked at us directly and blessed us all.” The Pope in his sermon even mentioned Celtic, stating on the occasion in front of the 80,000 audience that the ” Glasgow Celtic from Scotland were with us today “. Fan’s favourite Charlie Tully wrote lovingly on this experience in his biography, and is a measure of the respect he had for the Pope and the club for giving him such an opportunity.
Who do Celtic fans support in England?
– I don’t really follow any particular team in England. On one point I know that quite a lot of Gers fans from Northern Ireland support Man U stemming from the days of George Best/Norman Whiteside.
Do Celtic have the best fans in the world?
THAT the Celtic supporters are the greatest in the world is now official after the Hoops faithful were awarded the FIFA 2017 Fan Award tonight at a glittering ceremony in London.
Why is England not considered Celtic?
Forgetting all about the likes of who came from where, DNA analyses, and the various definitions of what constitutes being ‘Celtic’, England is not considered to be a Celtic country simply because the ‘native’ language of the country (i.e. English) is a Germanic language, whereas the ‘native’ languages of Scotland,